Emma Argues With Principal Figgins: Reasoning Of Arguments, Solution, Handling Strategies

Why did Emma argue with principal figgins? And what is the subject and motto of their arguments? Emma argued with Principal Figgins because they had different perspectives on school policies. The subject of their arguments was the involvement of students. In decision-making processes that affect the functioning of the school. Emma believed that students should have a say in these matters. 

While Principal Figgins emphasized the importance of following regulations and maintaining smooth operations. The main motive behind their arguments was to find a resolution. That balanced student input and respect for the law. When a school guidance counselor, Emma Pillsbury stands with Principal Figgins. The topics that arise are related to students’ future and power. Emma Pillsbury raised her voice with full evidence. 

Based on the need for improvement in the education system. She challenged the existing rigid policies. And offered new solutions and ideas to bring about positive change. Her focus was on the well-being and independence of the students. Principal Figgins initially supported the old leadership style and the existing education system. 

However, in the end, the argument was resolved through recognition and effective communication. They took the initiative to reanalyze the policies and set new action plans and rules. They made new policies for the betterment of the education system. 

In this article, we discuss, why Emma argues with principal figgins, reasoning of arguments, solutions, and handling strategies.

Understanding The Reason Of Emma Argues With Principal Figgins 

The intense debate started between Emma and the principal figgins that seemed to never end. 

But the question arises what are the reasons for disagreements?

• Emma strongly believed that art education is crucial for students. Because it highlights their creativity. And helps us understand their minds more easily through art and craft. However, Principal Figgins disagreed, he thinks that it is not necessary. And the expenses could be better invested elsewhere.
• Emma made a valid point about the importance of s*x education for students. Understanding gender and s*xual education. Make it easier for students to navigate relationships and work together. But Principal Figgins felt uncomfortable discussing such a sensitive topic openly in front of everyone.
• Emma raised a valid argument about the distribution and allocation of school funds. She believed that it is crucial to invest in students’ extracurricular activities such as sports, drama clubs, and debate teams.
• Emma emphasized the importance of adopting disciplined approaches. And using regenerative justice techniques to address conflicts between faculty and students. But Principal Figgins still believes in following rigid techniques. Where any wrongdoing leads to immediate eviction.

The Glee Television Series Where EMMA Argues With Principal Figgins

As we know Glee was a blockbuster musical comedy television show that telecast from 2009-2015 and generated a loyal fan following during its six seasons. Specified at the fabricated William McKinley High School in Ohio, Glee pursued the challenges and victories of the school’s glee club partners. 

While directing the drama of high school, the musically gifted students discovered friendship, acceptance, and their sounds through song. Two decision makers usually at risk were guidance counselor Emma Pillsbury and Principal Figgins. 

Emma was a star for students’ psychological well-being who argued with Figgins’ emphasis on budgets and test scores.

Directing Student Emotional Health Problems 

The cooperation between Emma and Figgins in acknowledging the influence of untreated mental health problems on student education highlighted the relevance of facilitating support rather than entirely focusing on corrective discipline.

Rules Follow To Resolve The Argument

Emma argues with principal figures, a serious matter is required to follow these key rules.

Recognition Of Serious Issue

Both parties need to recognize and understand each other’s concerns when the matter is serious. When both parties take the time to listen and understand each other’s perspectives. So they easily find the solution to the problems.

Open Communication

Open and sincere conversations are key in resolving misunderstandings. They help create a pathway for mutual respect and understanding. Mutual respect is important in fostering a positive and productive dialogue.

Again Look After Policies 

Modifying existing policies and considering students’ needs. Both are essential steps in creating a safe and supportive environment. It’s important to prioritize the well-being and safety of students.

Making Of New Proposal

To ensure the effective implementation of the changed policies. It would be beneficial to create a visible proposal. This proposal can outline the specific steps and actions. They needed to implement the new policies and establish new responsibilities for different stakeholders. 

Improving Educational System

While improving the education system, we need to set an example in schools. And creating a supportive environment where every student’s voice is heard is crucial.

Steps To Handle Educational Norms And Principles 

Emma argues with Principal Figgins because Figgins didn’t prospect the educational norms and policies.

• Students should be the central focus and the school’s principal should prioritize the development and well-being of students. 
• It is important to create policies that address the needs of students. They can handle students from diverse backgrounds. 
• Equality should be a fundamental norm ensuring that every student has equal rights. And the opportunity to express their point of view to the school system and faculty. 
• Teachers should have the freedom to exercise their professional judgment in the classroom. They need to have clear and open communication with stakeholders to develop understanding and trust. 
• Open communication and trust-building are key to fostering a successful educational experience for everyone involved.

Lecturers For Future Communication

The consequences of Emma’s argument with Principal Figgins’s dispute presented as a turning point for the school places to learn precious lessons for future meetings. 

Mediating on the happening, this issue has prominent chances for growth and understanding. Discovering this education from the dispute offers a framework for encouraging more meaningful discussions and joint efforts among students, professors, and administrators in the future. 

It highlights the value of learning from demanding experiences to create a powerful and more unified educational community.

Conclusion 

Concluding the intense debate, Emma argues that principal figures have a strong sense of confidence regarding school policies. Both of them are very passionate about their positions. Emma maintained a belief that students should participate in decision-making processes that affect the working of the school. 

In comparison, Principal Figgins believed in maintaining strong adherence to the law and ensuring smooth operations. Both position holders came up with a solution. And easily resolve the agreement by practicing active listening. 

They decided on the new policies for the school’s functioning. That would be created collaboratively by the faculty and students. This way, a sense of responsibility is instilled in the students. And they can freely express their perspectives. 

This argument teaches us the importance of improving communication. Through empathy, respect, and active listening resolve conflicts and find solutions to problems. By understanding each other’s needs, we can fulfill them while resolving the battle.

Furthermore, you understand the complete debate Emma argues with Principal Figgins in this article. And tell us which controversial topic you might want to understand next. Thank you!

FAQs On Emma Argues With Principal Figgins

1: What was the argument between Emma and Principal Figgins about?

Emma and Principal Figgins argued about the school dress code policy based on different assumptions. Assumptions can often lead to misunderstandings and disagreements. 

2: Did the argument lead to any positive changes within Millington High School?

Yes, the argument triggered a positive change in the school policies. Students are now allowed to openly participate. They even form a student-led committee to contribute to the changes. Students have a voice and can actively shape their school environment.

3: What lessons can be learned from this argument?

Emma argues with Principal Figgins and highlights the importance of efficient communication. And they teach us that by actively listening to each other. We can easily understand each other’s points and find solutions. And cheerfully, disagreements can be resolved. 

You may like to read about the following:

Who is Janine Tate; Younger Sister of Controversial Andrew Tate

Kanye West’s Spouse Bianca Censori: Early Life, Education, Family, Career Timeline & Controversies

Adin Ross Sister – Naomi Ross: Biography, Physical Appearance, Career, Love Life & Controversies

 Is Tekashi Gay and Who’s  6ix9ine Bf?

For more information, visit Whatsmind.com